NFL public relations falls short of ‘transparency’
NFL public relations falls short of ‘transparency’Published October 9, 2017
Members of the Pro Football Writers of America read with interest the article outlining how the NFL public relations department has a new “forceful communications approach” when dealing with the media and league issues.
Unfortunately, the league’s actions have not consistently matched Lockhart’s words. For example:
■ The league has yet to invite ALL national media to participate in the weekly conference calls with Lockhart that were referenced in the story. In fact, only select reporters have received emails inviting them to join in. How can there be transparency if only select reporters are told about them ahead of time?
■ Zeke Elliott was suspended six games by the league for alleged domestic violence, yet in the notification letter that was made public the league failed to mention that Kia Roberts — the NFL’s lead investigator and the only person to interview the accuser — recommended no suspension for Elliott because of credibility issues with the accuser. The league also refused to make the commissioner available for cross examination in the appeals hearing. Is that transparency?
■ Reporters on multiple occasions have reached out to Lockhart on serious league issues, yet failed each time to receive a response. Is that transparency?
Our membership believes true transparency requires access to the key decision-makers, something that has decreased in recent years, not increased. For instance, commissioner Roger Goodell attended the Chargers’ first preseason game in Los Angeles following the franchise’s controversial move from San Diego. Local reporters were interested in hearing his views on the success of the move to that point, but he did not make himself available. Is that transparency?
As Lockhart stated, improved transparency can’t be measured in a sample size of a few weeks. But the narrative that the league is being more open and transparent (and accessible) is disingenuous at best and inaccurate at worst. Even on the lower end of the food chain, PFWA members continue to fight for issues like accurate injury reports and access to assistant coaches, not to mention strict enforcement of the media policy.
Michael Signora, the league’s liaison with the PFWA, always has handled our discussions with professionalism and integrity. We thank the league for his assistance. But to allow Lockhart to say that his office and, by extension, the commissioner’s office is more transparent because of a few conference calls is thin at best — particularly when transparency is measured over the long haul and, most importantly, when it limits access to key decision-makers in situations the league may not be comfortable with.
Marketing and Sponsorship
Indians claim a rare ratings win
Takeaways from the surprise Altice-ESPN carriage agreement
For Golf properties, bittersweet split with Time
ESPN-Formula one talks reunite Magnus, Bratches
Startup sees good news as good business
YouTube TV’s deal for Series fills MLB’s presenting sponsor roster for postseason
Labor and Agents
Leagues and Governing Bodies
Cubs pleased with Facebook livestream test
Reed: Facebook in collaborative role with broadcasters, rights holders
Oregon sees huge social media impact for #StompOutCancer
Michigan unites behind #CrashCrisler effort
Facebook gives Bucks real-time impact on sales
Kings keep true to personality on Twitter
A look at social media engagement in U.S. college, pro team sports