Plugged In: Colin Campbell
Plugged In: Colin CampbellPublished October 2, 2017
Spending more than two decades as a player and coach before joining the league office in 1998, there are few around the NHL who can match the tenure and depth of experience in the sport of Colin Campbell. That history and knowledge of the game is crucial for Campbell in his role as senior executive vice president of hockey operations, where he’s tasked with overseeing all of the league’s rule changes and implementation of things like video replay.
It’s always a tug-of-war between wanting to advance the game with all of the tools that are available in the 21st century, while also keeping the traditions alive.”
On making changes to rules like slashing and interference: One of the things that we try to balance is how do we reward an offensive team, while also keeping the physicality of the game. That was our challenge coming out of the 2004-05 lockout where we had a number of rule changes in an effort to open up the game, which was getting too defensive. Certain people will say the game is too quick now — personally I don’t think it’s too fast, but you have to be careful. It’s an issue we are always working on.
On balancing hockey’s traditions: I think it’s great to maintain traditions and how things were done when the game was founded, but you also have to advance the sport and take into consideration what fans want to see. I would consider myself a traditionalist, but that doesn’t mean we can ignore ideas that may bring more entertainment and excitement to the game. That’s always a tough sell with the coaches, though. When I was coaching [the New York Rangers], driving home from Madison Square Garden, I don’t think I could have ever said to myself, “I know we lost the game, but man, wasn’t that pretty exciting?” They don’t care a hoot about that, but we have to sell the game.
On future rule changes: We never want to make a lot of changes, but also try to recognize areas where things could be tweaked. We look at equipment and the trends there. There’s the long-standing debate of bigger nets and how that would impact scoring. But to me it’s like making the net larger in the NBA, or increasing the size of the holes in golf — it’s never a guarantee that will lead to something better. I’ve seen some great 1-0 games and 7-5 games I’d never want to see again.
Leagues and Governing Bodies
For NFL, which way forward?
The issue of unity: NBA
The issue of unity: MLB
The issue of unity: MLS
The issue of unity: NHL
The issue of unity: WNBA
The issue of unity: USOC
The issue of unity: NASCAR
The issue of unity: Fans
First Look podcast: Division and unity
NASCAR asking official sponsors for help in finding new rides for Wallace, Patrick
For MLB, a murderers’ row of playoff teams
Handler to exit CMO post at MLS, eyes next big challenge
Marketing and Sponsorship
Labor and Agents
Fate of CBA hinges on economic issues
Foley confident in revenue potential of Golden Knights
NHL team execs, owners in the spotlight
NHL media partners to watch
Browning eager to harness passion of NHL fans
NHL’s Lehanski shifts focus to technology
Execs leading the NHL's big initiatives
Big events on tap for Kelleher at USA Hockey
Sponsors have a lot riding on NHL season
Judge presides over class-action suit
McDavid growing into standout role
2 hockey players poised for big role, big stage in coming season
Key voices for NHL players
NHL ad spending